Racemax x Automobili Lamborghini

This road-focused speed score is primarily about smooth-surface momentum and top-end efficiency. This means it trades speed for comfort, durability, or practicality. What pushes it in this direction is wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. If you ride in a group, it influences how hard it feels to stay on wheels at higher speeds.

Uphill performance score: 2.5/10. Within Road bikes, this comes out below average. On climbs, the lowest gear feels tall. Your easiest gear lands around 30.0 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~36% for low-gear climbing. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. It can climb, but you’ll likely prefer smoother pacing on longer hills. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

Looking at it as a gravel setup, with geometry that’s fairly neutral, coming in at 4.6/10 on aero, it’s a practical middle ground so it won’t hold you back on normal fast riding. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The gravel tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. It feels this way because bars are around 88 mm lower than the saddle, which is a large drop, and the forward stretch measures around 542 mm (long). Plan for roughly 37 degrees of lean. Gravel setups typically avoid an extreme tuck for stability.

Overall, it falls into Adjustable. What drives the fit flexibility here: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward. At the same time, Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Ride comfort is 6.0/10 — on a real ride it feels fairly neutral. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. It’s running about 40 mm tires on 700c wheels, and wider tires let you drop pressure a touch, which smooths out rough pavement on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~37°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

It’s hard to see the value at this asking price. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 237% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 0% of them. To anchor it: price €10.139 versus an estimated €3.005 for a similar build. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This bike is comfortable on gravel roads and unpaved back roads, and it still rides well on tarmac. The tire size is around 40 mm, which gives grip and control on loose gravel. The wheel setup (700c) supports that direction.