Jari 1.1

In a road context, the speed rating is about holding pace with less effort once you're up to speed. It ends up here thanks to a heavier build, a mass profile that isn't optimized for punchy acceleration, wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. All combined, they influence momentum - how hard it is to get moving and how hard it is to keep moving.

Climb score: 6.5/10. Within Road bikes, this comes out around the middle. On longer climbs, the gearing lands on the easy side. The easiest gear works out to about 25.4 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~73% versus similar bikes. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. Weight is around 10.3 kg, which is typical for this kind of build. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

Category-wise (gravel), scoring 4.5/10 on aero, it’s an all-round aero level so it’s more efficient than it looks once you’re rolling. What that means on the road is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Different categories trade aerodynamics against comfort and stability—gravel is part of that story. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. Different brands share different amounts of detail, so this uses the most consistent cues that are available. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. You get this posture because the cockpit sits 93 mm below the saddle (a large drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~541 mm (long). You'll likely be near 38 degrees of lean. Spacer height is roughly 20 mm.

So we classify it as Adjustable. Why this fit flexibility rating: The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts; The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Comfort comes out to 6.0/10, which usually translates to a moderately comfortable ride. That’s why it’s labeled Balanced. It’s running about 40 mm tires on 700c wheels, and wider tires let you drop pressure a touch, which smooths out rough pavement on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~38°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This reads like a good buy compared with similar bikes. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec estimate, the price is close to what we’d expect for a comparable build. In its peer group, it tends to be better-priced than many, beating about 69% of listings. To anchor it: price €2.399 versus an estimated €2.524 for a similar build. Bottom line: it compares well against similar bikes.

This setup is built for mixed rides where gravel is a normal part of the route. Tires around 40 mm are well suited for gravel roads and unpaved connectors. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.