BokehTi Shimano

It's a balanced setup rather than a pure speed machine. This road-focused speed score is primarily about smooth-surface momentum and top-end efficiency. What pushes it in this direction is a default tire-width baseline, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance.

If your rides include hills, it rates 4.4/10 for climbing. Within Road bikes, it lands around the middle. The easiest gear is very spin-friendly on hills. The easiest gear works out to about 23.8 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~86% of them. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. This kind of low gear helps you stay smooth on long or steep climbs. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

Seen as a gravel option, scoring 4.7/10 on aero, it’s a practical middle ground so it sits comfortably in the all-rounder lane. What that means on the road is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either. Real-world aero also depends on posture and setup, not just the published frame details.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. That's driven by you get a large drop: roughly 89 mm from saddle to bar, plus about 549 mm of stretch forward (long). You'll likely be near 37 degrees of lean. Gravel geometry often balances comfort and control over rough surfaces.

Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time. Plus, Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts. That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

This scores 5.9/10 for comfort, so it feels fairly neutral out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~37°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

For the spec, this is priced well into premium territory. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 163% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 2% of them. To anchor it: price €6.554 versus an estimated €2.496 for a similar build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This bike is comfortable on gravel roads and unpaved back roads, and it still rides well on tarmac. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.