BokehTi SRAM

For road-style bikes, the score is a proxy for how fast the build feels on normal pavement. It trends this way because of typical road tire sizing assumptions, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance. Those ingredients add up to a setup that either preserves speed or bleeds it off.

On steep roads, it comes in at 4.4/10. Within Road bikes, it ranks around the middle. When it gets steep, the gearing feels very easy. That lowest gear comes out around 23.8 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~86% for low-gear climbing. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. This kind of low gear helps you stay smooth on long or steep climbs. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

Looking at it as a gravel setup, aero-wise, at 4.7/10, it aims for usable speed without big trade-offs and it doesn’t force a specialist aero posture. What that means on the road is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The gravel tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. It feels this way because the front end is large, with ~89 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a long stretch forward at ~549 mm. Plan for roughly 37 degrees of lean. Gravel setups typically avoid an extreme tuck for stability.

In Road / Gravel, Separate bar and stem components keep fit changes practical, and Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical. Net result: Adjustable.

Ride comfort is 5.9/10 — on a real ride it feels fairly neutral. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~37°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This looks like a high asking price for the build level. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 200% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 1% of them. Quick reference: €7.490 listed versus about €2.496 for a comparable build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Overall, you can likely find better value elsewhere.

This setup is built for mixed rides where gravel is a normal part of the route. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. The wheel setup (700c) supports that direction.