Torque Mullet AL 7

This off-road speed score leans toward efficient rolling, not downhill stability or comfort. The setup that matters most here is a heavier build, typical trail-width tires, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Put together, they influence both acceleration and the effort needed to hold speed. On smoother terrain, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground.

Uphill performance score: 8.9/10. Within Mountain bikes, this comes out near the top. On climbs, the lowest gear feels very easy. The easiest gear works out to about 16.9 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~77% of them. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. At about 16.4 kg, it’s a heavy build; the low gear matters even more when the slope kicks up. It’s set up so climbs feel controlled rather than a grind. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

Suspension sits at 8/10, in “High-impact ready”. That usually means it’s built for harder hits and rougher trails with steadier wheel tracking. Both ends absorb impacts, improving how consistently the tires can follow rough terrain. Travel is how far the suspension can move when it hits a bump — here it’s about 170 mm up front and 170 mm at the rear. As a rule of thumb, more travel gives more headroom for bigger impacts. On rough trails, this level aims to keep the bike settled under braking and cornering through repeated hits.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. This is mainly because there's about 87 mm of drop to the bars (large), with roughly 642 mm of forward stretch to the bar (extreme). Plan for roughly 35 degrees of lean.

Overall, it is Moderately Adjustable. Here is the simple reasoning behind the fit flexibility rating: A modular front-end gives more freedom to change stem length or bar width, Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical - Seatpost info looks fairly neutral, so most fit change comes from cockpit choices. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Ride comfort is 8.5/10 — on a real ride it feels plush. So it’s tagged Comfortable overall. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 8/10, torso ~35°), which puts you in an attack stance, which can feel more intense on long, rough descents.

This looks like strong value without any tricky caveats. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 22% under the typical level for similar builds. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 88% of listings. Quick reference: €3.359 listed versus about €4.320 for a comparable build. Overall, it looks like a great-value pick in its category.

This bike is made for very rough terrain, big hits, and bike-park riding. It has about 170 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which is useful for big hits and steeper descents. It’s listed as Enduro, but the parts point more toward Bike Park.