URS 01 LT TWO

For road-style bikes, the score is a proxy for how fast the build feels on normal pavement. In day-to-day use, it's better suited to relaxed riding than pushing fast splits. The score is largely shaped by a heavier build, very wide tires that create extra drag, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Over a longer ride, it tends to feel more lively when you increase the pace.

On steep roads, it comes in at 7.7/10. Within Road bikes, this comes out above average. On climbs, the lowest gear feels very easy. That lowest gear comes out around 23.8 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~86% of them. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. At about 10.4 kg, it’s in a normal range, so gearing matters more than weight swings here. This kind of low gear helps you stay smooth on long or steep climbs. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

For a gravel build, with a 5.0/10 aero score, it’s built to be well-rounded in the wind so it feels ‘quick enough’ without being a pure aero build. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The gravel category also hints at the intent behind the design. This setup supports a more race-leaning posture, helping you present less of your body to the wind. Wider tyres like this tend to trade a bit of aero efficiency for comfort and confidence. A more integrated front end usually reduces minor drag points around the cockpit. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. Because you get a large drop: roughly 91 mm from saddle to bar, plus about 579 mm of stretch forward (long). Estimated lean is about 37 degrees. Gravel geometry often balances comfort and control over rough surfaces.

That is why we tag it Moderately Adjustable. Fit flexibility summary: This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability, A more service-friendly routing setup makes changes easier, and A proprietary post often means fewer off-the-shelf alternatives. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Comfort comes out to 6.3/10, which usually translates to a nicely smooth ride. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. It’s running about 44 mm tires on 700c wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~37°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

For the spec, this is priced well into premium territory. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 64% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 18% of them. Quick reference: €6.825 listed versus about €4.156 for a comparable build. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This setup is built for mixed rides where gravel is a normal part of the route. The tire size is around 44 mm, which gives grip and control on loose gravel. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.