NUROAD C:62 RACE

On the road, small changes in drag and tire resistance add up, and this score captures that effect. Next to race-leaning setups, this build is shaped by a light setup, a lighter-feeling mass profile that helps on accelerations and tempo climbs, wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding.

Uphill performance score: 9.1/10. Within Road bikes, it lands near the top. The easiest gear is very spin-friendly on hills. That lowest gear comes out around 23.8 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~86% for low-gear climbing. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. At about 8.2 kg, it’s in a normal range, so gearing matters more than weight swings here. You’ll be able to keep a steady spin even when it gets steep. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

On the gravel side of things, that 4.7/10 aero rating suggests that with geometry that’s fairly neutral, it sits in the ‘good enough everywhere’ aero zone and it doesn’t force a specialist aero posture. Put simply, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. A more integrated front end usually reduces minor drag points around the cockpit. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. This is mainly because the bar sits about 79 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and you'll be stretched forward about 562 mm in total (long). Plan for roughly 35 degrees of lean.

In Road / Gravel, That is why we tag it Moderately Adjustable. What affects adjustability on this bike: This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability, and Routing through the headset can make cockpit swaps harder than normal internal routing. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

This scores 5.9/10 for comfort, so it feels balanced out on the road. That’s why it’s labeled Balanced. It’s running about 40 mm tires on 700c wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~35°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

Compared to similar bikes, this is priced very competitively. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 28% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 90% of listings. To anchor it: price €3.674 versus an estimated €5.076 for a similar build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This setup is built for mixed rides where gravel is a normal part of the route. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.