NUROAD RACE FE

For road bikes, the speed score favors setups that waste less energy at higher speeds. The biggest contributors are a heavier build, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Over longer efforts, it prioritizes confidence and everyday riding over outright pace.

If your rides include hills, it rates 6.3/10 for climbing. Within Road bikes, it lands around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels very easy. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 23.8 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~86% versus similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. Weight is around 12.1 kg, which you notice more on longer or slower climbs. It’s set up so climbs feel controlled rather than a grind. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

Seen as a gravel option, scoring 4.5/10 on aero, it’s an all-round aero level and it doesn’t force a specialist aero posture. Put simply, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Wider tyres like this tend to trade a bit of aero efficiency for comfort and confidence. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. You get this posture because the cockpit sits 69 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~558 mm (long). You'll likely be near 33 degrees of lean. Front-end spacers are estimated around 19 mm.

In Road, Main reasons for the fit flexibility result: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward. Another point: Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical. Overall, it falls into Adjustable. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Ride comfort is 5.9/10 — on a real ride it feels moderately comfortable. That’s why it’s labeled Balanced. It’s running about 40 mm tires on 700c wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~33°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This looks like a great buy for the spec on paper. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 31% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 91% of listings. To anchor it: price €1.679 versus an estimated €2.450 for a similar build. Overall, it looks like a great-value pick in its category.

This bike is comfortable on gravel roads and unpaved back roads, and it still rides well on tarmac. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.