BROAM 60

This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. Compared with comfort-biased setups, this build is shaped by a heavier build, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag, and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value.

Uphill performance score: 5.5/10. Within Road bikes, it ranks around the middle. It has a middle-of-the-road low gear for climbing. That lowest gear comes out around 27.0 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~58% for low-gear climbing. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. With roughly 11.3 kg to move uphill, you’ll feel it more as climbs get longer. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

From a gravel perspective, scoring 4.5/10 on aero, it lands in the ‘do-most-things-well’ aero zone so it feels versatile, not single-purpose. What that means on the road is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Wider tyres like this tend to trade a bit of aero efficiency for comfort and confidence. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts.

Comfort fit - comfort-leaning without feeling sluggish. It feels this way because bars are around 61 mm lower than the saddle, which is a moderate drop, and the forward stretch measures around 552 mm (long). Expect a lean angle around 32 degrees. Spacer height is roughly 21 mm.

This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical, and Seatpost details do not strongly point to a very locked-in or very flexible system. That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Comfort comes out to 5.9/10, which usually translates to a moderately comfortable ride. That’s why it’s labeled Balanced. It’s running about 40 mm tires on 700c wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~32°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

This looks like a great buy for the spec on paper. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 13% under the typical level for similar builds. In its peer group, it tends to be better-priced than many, beating about 77% of listings. Quick reference: €1.312 listed versus about €1.507 for a comparable build. Overall, it looks like a great-value pick in its category.

This bike is ready for gravel roads while staying efficient on paved stretches. Tires around 40 mm are well suited for gravel roads and unpaved connectors. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.