ROQA Allroad

This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. Relative to performance-oriented builds, this build is shaped by a fairly average weight, a lighter-feeling mass profile that helps on accelerations and tempo climbs, wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag, and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value.

Climbing rating: 9.8/10. Within Road bikes, it ranks near the top. It’s set up for steady spinning on climbs. Your easiest gear lands around 19.8 gear inches. It’s about as easy as it gets in its peer group — easier than roughly ~96% of similar bikes. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. Weight is around 8.8 kg, which is typical for this kind of build. This kind of low gear helps you stay smooth on long or steep climbs. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

From a gravel perspective, coming in at 4.7/10 on aero, it’s an all-round aero level and it doesn’t force a specialist aero posture. Put simply, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. A tidier cockpit and cable routing can help a little once you’re riding quickly. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts.

Comfort fit - less tuck and easier on neck and shoulders. Based on full geometry data.

Why this fit flexibility rating: Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time - Internal routing is a mild hit to swap-and-go adjustability. Overall, it is Moderately Adjustable. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

This scores 6.3/10 for comfort, so it feels nicely smooth out on the road. That’s why it’s labeled Balanced. It’s running about 40 mm tires on 29" wheels, and wider tires let you drop pressure a touch, which smooths out rough pavement on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This feels like you’re paying extra for the same kind of bike. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 32% above what similar builds typically cost. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 36% of listings). Quick reference: €3.779 listed versus about €2.866 for a comparable build. Overall, it doesn’t look like the best value for the spec.

This bike is comfortable on gravel roads and unpaved back roads, and it still rides well on tarmac. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.