Four Corners 2

For road bikes, this score reflects how easily the bike carries speed on smooth tarmac. Most of the story comes from very wide tires that create extra drag, a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance. So overall, it tends to feel slower when you try to hold a high tempo. Some specs are missing, so parts of the estimate lean on typical defaults.

If your rides include hills, it rates 4.1/10 for climbing. Within Road bikes, it sits around the middle. The easiest gear leans spin-friendly when it tilts up. Your easiest gear lands around 24.5 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~78% versus similar bikes. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

From a gravel perspective, an aero score of 4.4/10 means that it’s not chasing marginal aero gains so it’s happier when the route gets rough than when it gets windy. What that means on the road is: it’s more about stability and everyday comfort than cutting through the wind. The wheels are on the shallower side (around 25mm), so frame shapes and position likely matter more than wheel depth here. This looks like a practical wheel choice rather than a max-aero choice. Tyres around 44mm are clearly aimed at comfort and control, and that usually adds some drag in the wind. In real riding, it usually feels steady and comfortable, with less advantage on open flats or into a headwind.

Comfort fit - a relaxed road posture that stays friendly on longer rides. That's driven by the bar sits about 37 mm below the saddle (a very small drop), and you'll be stretched forward about 573 mm in total (long). Plan for roughly 27 degrees of lean. Estimated spacers: ~20 mm.

So we classify it as Adjustable. This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time, A more service-friendly routing setup makes changes easier. Another point: Seatpost info looks fairly neutral, so most fit change comes from cockpit choices. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Comfort comes out to 6.3/10, which usually translates to a easygoing over rough patches ride. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. It’s running about 44 mm tires on 700c wheels, and wider tires let you drop pressure a touch, which smooths out rough pavement on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This feels like you’re paying extra for the same kind of bike. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 18% above the typical level for similar builds. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 48% of listings). Quick reference: €2.309 listed versus about €1.955 for a comparable build. Bottom line: you may be paying extra versus similar options.

This bike is ready for gravel roads while staying efficient on paved stretches. Tires around 44 mm are well suited for gravel roads and unpaved connectors. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.