SCULTURA TEAM

For road riding, the score leans toward outright pace rather than comfort-first priorities. Relative to performance-oriented builds, this build is shaped by a very light build, a lighter-feeling mass profile that helps on accelerations and tempo climbs, all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, and a high-end drivetrain that tends to feel crisp under load.

Uphill performance score: 6.1/10. Within Road bikes, this comes out around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels tall. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 32.4 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~18% for low-gear climbing. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. Weight is around 7.2 kg, so it won’t feel overly stubborn on long climbs. This is happiest on flatter terrain; steep stuff will feel demanding. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

In race-focused terms, with a cleaner-looking front end, sitting at 8.2/10 for aero, it’s built to waste less energy pushing air and it’ll feel quicker on open roads. Put simply, it’s built with speed in mind, with choices that reduce wind drag once you’re riding faster. Different categories trade aerodynamics against comfort and stability—race is part of that story. A lower front end can help you tuck in a bit, even if the bike itself isn’t built as an aero specialist. Rims around 45mm are more of an all-round choice than a pure aero choice. That wheel depth is more all-round than purely aero-focused. Tyres around 28mm fit a faster road setup and usually keep drag in check. A more integrated front end usually reduces minor drag points around the cockpit. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. On flatter roads and into headwinds, this kind of setup often feels noticeably quicker than more comfort-first designs.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. That's driven by there's about 101 mm of drop to the bars (large), with roughly 577 mm of forward stretch to the bar (long). Plan for roughly 39 degrees of lean. Spacer height is roughly 8 mm.

This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: An integrated cockpit tends to limit simple changes like a different stem length. Another point: Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical. So it ends up in Limited Adjustment.

Comfort comes out to 3.0/10, which usually translates to a more responsive than cushy ride. That’s the reason it lands as Firm. It’s running about 28 mm tires on 700c wheels, and narrow tires usually mean higher pressure, so more buzz comes through on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~39°), which tends to feel more direct, especially over rougher sections.

This looks like a typical market price for the spec. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 15% above the typical level for similar builds. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 57% of listings). Quick reference: €9.987 listed versus about €8.721 for a comparable build. Overall, it sits in the expected range for the category.

This bike is best when your rides stay on clean tarmac. The tire size is around 28 mm, which is typical for fast road setups. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.