Track Comp

This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. This means it lands in the middle: capable pace, but not optimized for outright speed. It ends up here thanks to a fairly average weight, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, narrow road tires that keep resistance low, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over...

If your rides include hills, it rates 1.2/10 for climbing. Within Road bikes, it ranks near the bottom. For hill work, the easiest gear is very tall. Your easiest gear lands around 77.6 gear inches. Most comparable bikes have an easier low gear; this is easier than only about ~0% of them. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. Weight is around 9.8 kg, which is typical for this kind of build. On proper hills, you’ll feel it — this setup isn’t built to make climbing effortless. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

As a track bike, aero-wise, at 9.6/10, with a more tucked fit, it’s designed around going fast in exposed conditions with a clear speed-over-everything bias. What that means on the road is: it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. Different categories trade aerodynamics against comfort and stability—track is part of that story. That tyre width is common on performance road builds and tends to suit aero goals. On fast flats and windy days, it’s built to feel like it wastes less energy pushing air.

Race / Pro fit - an aggressive tuck meant for hard efforts over pure comfort. This is mainly because bar height comes out ~175 mm below the saddle (very large), with about 566 mm of forward reach - a long stretch. Estimated lean is about 50 degrees.

In Road / Track, Main reasons for the fit flexibility result: The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts, Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability; The listed seatpost details do not show clear restrictions or extra flexibility signals. Net result: Moderately Adjustable. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

This scores 1.8/10 for comfort, so it feels very firm out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Race-Stiff. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and narrow tires usually mean higher pressure, so more buzz comes through on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is race-leaning (posture 8/10, torso ~50°), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

This looks like strong value without any tricky caveats. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 73% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 98% of listings. To anchor it: price €449 versus an estimated €1.661 for a similar build. Some manufacturer details aren’t fully published, so use this as a helpful direction rather than a final verdict. Overall, it looks like a great-value pick in its category.

This setup is focused on speed and efficiency on paved roads. Tires around 25 mm usually mean it’s tuned for smooth-road speed. The wheel setup (700c) supports that direction.