Synapse Neo SE

This road speed rating is tuned for paved riding - think steady fast tempo and easier acceleration. Compared with comfort-biased setups, this build is shaped by very wide tires that create extra drag, a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance. This means it prioritizes confidence and everyday riding over outright pace.

Uphill performance score: 2.9/10. Within e-road bikes, it sits below average. On climbs, the lowest gear feels tall. Your easiest gear lands around 28.3 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~39% of them. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. Being an e-bike helps on climbs because the assist adds steady push when you need it. A good middle-ground if you want mixed routes that include some hills. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

In endurance terms, that 5.6/10 aero rating suggests that it’s an all-round aero level so it works well across lots of riding. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The endurance category also hints at the intent behind the design. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Comfort fit - a relaxed road posture that stays friendly on longer rides. It feels this way because the cockpit sits 48 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~555 mm (long). Expect a lean angle around 30 degrees.

Why this fit flexibility rating: This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability, Because cables are routed internally, adjustments may take more work, and Seatpost details do not strongly point to a very locked-in or very flexible system. So we classify it as Adjustable.

Comfort comes out to 6.7/10, which usually translates to a easygoing over rough patches ride. That’s why it’s labeled Comfortable. It’s running about 47 mm tires on 650b wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~30°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

Overall, this looks like solid value for the build. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 8% under the typical level for similar builds. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 56% of listings). To anchor it: price €4.550 versus an estimated €4.920 for a similar build. Put simply: it’s competitively priced for what you get.

This setup is built for mixed rides where gravel is a normal part of the route. Tires around 47 mm are well suited for gravel roads and unpaved connectors. Even though it’s tagged Endurance, the spec pushes it toward Gravel Ready.