E-VAULT Team GRX Di2 w/ Carbon Wheels

This road-focused speed score is primarily about smooth-surface momentum and top-end efficiency. The setup that matters most here is all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance.

On steep roads, it comes in at 3.3/10. Within e-road bikes, it ranks below average. The low gear is workable, but not super easy on steep ramps. Your easiest gear lands around 27.0 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~54% versus similar bikes. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. E-assist can take the sting out of steep ramps, especially at lower speeds. It won’t be the absolute best climber, but it won’t hold you back on most climbs either. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

For a gravel build, rated 4.5/10 for aero, it’s an all-round aero level so it feels versatile, not single-purpose. What that means on the road is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. The wheels are on the shallower side (around 23mm), so frame shapes and position likely matter more than wheel depth here. These wheels lean more toward stability and versatility than pure aero. Tyres around 32mm are a practical middle ground, with a small aero trade-off compared with narrower race tyres. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. It feels this way because the cockpit sits 77 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~571 mm (long). Estimated lean is about 35 degrees. Gravel setups typically avoid an extreme tuck for stability.

In E-bikeRoad / Gravel, Fit flexibility summary: A modular front-end gives more freedom to change stem length or bar width, A more service-friendly routing setup makes changes easier. Also, Seatpost details do not strongly point to a very locked-in or very flexible system. Net result: Adjustable.

Ride comfort is 4.5/10 — on a real ride it feels fairly neutral. So it’s tagged Firm overall. It’s running about 32 mm tires on 700c wheels, and there’s a bit of cushion, but it still rides fairly direct on rough pavement on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~35°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This looks expensive compared with similar bikes. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 52% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 16% of them. Quick reference: €9.999 listed versus about €6.575 for a comparable build. Some manufacturer details aren’t fully published, so use this as a helpful direction rather than a final verdict. Overall, you can likely find better value elsewhere.

This bike sits between a pure road bike and a gravel bike for mixed-surface riding. The tire size is around 32 mm, which supports mixed routes without feeling slow on road. It’s listed as Gravel, but the setup aligns better with All Road.