Tempt 1

It tends to feel slower when you try to hold a high tempo. On an MTB, the speed score centers on rolling efficiency when you're pedaling, especially on easier terrain. The biggest contributors are typical trail-width tires and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value. On hardpack, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground.

Overall on climbs: 7.4/10. Within Mountain bikes, this comes out above average. The easiest gear is very spin-friendly on hills. That lowest gear comes out around 18.0 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~47% of them. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

Suspension capability comes out at 4/10. Bucket: “Basic bump control”. It’s designed for light bump absorption and steadier tracking on uneven patches. The fork does the smoothing; the rear stays straightforward and efficient. You’ll get better control on light roughness, but larger impacts can still unsettle the bike.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. It feels this way because there's about 38 mm of drop to the bars (very small), with roughly 573 mm of forward stretch to the bar (long). Estimated lean is about 28 degrees.

Net result: Adjustable. Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: A modular front-end gives more freedom to change stem length or bar width, Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts - The dropper adds a real-world adjustability benefit while riding. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Ride comfort is 6.4/10 — on a real ride it feels nicely smooth. That’s why it’s labeled Firm. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10), which gives a steady, predictable feel without pushing you too far forward.

For what you get, the price looks very hard to beat. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 50% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it tends to be better-priced than many, beating about 83% of listings. To anchor it: price €883 versus an estimated €1.778 for a similar build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This bike is best for smoother trails where speed and efficiency matter. It has about 80 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which suits smoother trails. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.