PHANTOM V3.2 Frame

In mountain-bike land, this is a pedaling-speed measure - how fast it rolls when you're working for it. The strongest influences are a very light build, a lighter-feeling build that helps when you're pedaling for speed, typical trail-width tires, and mid-size wheels that balance agility and momentum. When you're pedaling, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground (with a bit of defaulting).

How it climbs: 8.2/10. Within Mountain bikes, it sits above average. When it gets steep, the gearing feels very easy. The easiest gear works out to about 17.3 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~64% versus similar bikes. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

Overall suspension support: 1/10 (“Minimal suspension”). In practice, it’s at its best on steady, predictable surfaces. This summary reflects the suspension layout and what it typically implies in real use. When the surface breaks up, you’ll get more bump transmission and less wheel tracking than with higher scores.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. Some measurements were missing, so part of this is estimated.

Overall, it falls into Adjustable. Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts, and Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Ride comfort is 6.4/10 — on a real ride it feels comfortable. So it’s tagged Race-Stiff overall. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10), which keeps it balanced — not overly aggressive, not overly relaxed.

For the spec, this is priced well into premium territory. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 37% above what similar builds typically cost. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 31% of listings). To anchor it: price €2.799 versus an estimated €2.049 for a similar build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Overall, you can likely find better value elsewhere.

This bike is built for everyday trails with a mix of roots, rocks, and turns. Suspension travel details aren’t available here, so the label follows the category and the rest of the setup. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.