CROSS RACE C:62 PRO

For road bikes, this score reflects how easily the bike carries speed on smooth tarmac. Compared with comfort-biased setups, this build is shaped by a light setup, a lighter-feeling mass profile that helps on accelerations and tempo climbs, wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. So overall, it's more about stability and usefulness than feeling fast.

Climb score: 5.5/10. Within Road bikes, it sits around the middle. The easiest gear is on the tall side for proper hills. That lowest gear comes out around 31.8 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~28% of them. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. At about 8.4 kg, it’s in a normal range, so gearing matters more than weight swings here. It can climb, but you’ll likely prefer smoother pacing on longer hills. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

In cyclocross terms, with a fairly neutral fit, rated 5.8/10 for aero, it balances some streamlining with versatility so it won’t hold you back on normal fast riding. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The cyclocross tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Tyres around 33mm are a practical middle ground, with a small aero trade-off compared with narrower race tyres. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. You get this posture because the bar sits about 92 mm below the saddle (a large drop), and you'll be stretched forward about 559 mm in total (long). Estimated lean is about 38 degrees.

Fit flexibility summary: A modular front-end gives more freedom to change stem length or bar width, Internal routing is a mild hit to swap-and-go adjustability, and Seatpost details do not strongly point to a very locked-in or very flexible system. Overall, it falls into Adjustable.

Ride comfort is 4.7/10 — on a real ride it feels fairly neutral. That’s the reason it lands as Firm. It’s running about 33 mm tires on 700c wheels, and wider tires let you drop pressure a touch, which smooths out rough pavement on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~38°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

For what you get, the price looks very hard to beat. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 24% under the typical level for similar builds. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 86% of listings. Quick reference: €2.729 listed versus about €3.613 for a comparable build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This bike is comfortable on gravel roads and unpaved back roads, and it still rides well on tarmac. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.