Avail Advanced 0

It tends to feel slower when you try to hold a high tempo. For road bikes, the speed score favors setups that waste less energy at higher speeds. A few practical factors stand out: all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance.

If your rides include hills, it rates 3.8/10 for climbing. Within Road bikes, it ranks below average. The easiest gear leans spin-friendly when it tilts up. Your easiest gear lands around 25.5 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~72% versus similar bikes. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

As an endurance bike, scoring 6.1/10 on aero, it’s tuned for mixed riding rather than pure aero focus so you get some benefit when the wind matters. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Its endurance label helps explain the balance between speed, comfort, and versatility. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Comfort fit - less tuck and easier on neck and shoulders. You get this posture because the front end is moderate, with ~59 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a long stretch forward at ~523 mm. Estimated lean is about 33 degrees. Endurance geometry usually trades some tuck for all-day comfort.

In Road / Endurance, Main reasons for the fit flexibility result: Separate bar and stem components keep fit changes practical, A more service-friendly routing setup makes changes easier. Another point: This seatpost design is more specific than a round standard post, which reduces flexibility. That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Ride comfort is 5.0/10 — on a real ride it feels balanced. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. It’s running about 32 mm tires on 700c wheels, and it softens the edges a little, without feeling plush on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~33°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This looks like a high asking price for the build level. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 35% above what similar builds typically cost. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 39% of listings). To anchor it: price €4.409 versus an estimated €3.259 for a similar build. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This setup is made for real-world roads with cracks and patches. Tires around 34 mm add comfort and grip when the road surface breaks up. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.