Allroad Ti – Pro

On asphalt, it's mainly a question of resistance and efficiency, and that's what the score summarizes. Most of the story comes from typical road tire sizing assumptions, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Net effect: the bike either carries speed well or feels like more work to keep it rolling.

How it climbs: 3.3/10. Within Road bikes, it sits below average. The low gear is workable, but not super easy on steep ramps. The easiest gear works out to about 27.0 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~58% for low-gear climbing. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. It can climb, but you’ll likely prefer smoother pacing on longer hills. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

Category-wise (general road), an aero score of 5.8/10 means that with geometry that’s fairly neutral, it lands in the ‘do-most-things-well’ aero zone so it won’t hold you back on normal fast riding. What that means on the road is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The general road tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. That's driven by you get a large drop: roughly 94 mm from saddle to bar, plus about 551 mm of stretch forward (long). Plan for roughly 38 degrees of lean.

The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts, Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability. Plus, Seatpost info looks fairly neutral, so most fit change comes from cockpit choices. So we classify it as Adjustable.

Ride comfort is 5.0/10 — on a real ride it feels moderately comfortable. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~38°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

This looks like a high asking price for the build level. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 106% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 11% of them. Quick reference: €6.865 listed versus about €3.338 for a comparable build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Overall, you can likely find better value elsewhere.

This setup is made for real-world roads with cracks and patches. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.