Radar X

This road speed rating is tuned for paved riding - think steady fast tempo and easier acceleration. The strongest influences are a heavier build, very wide tires that create extra drag, a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance. Those ingredients add up to a setup that either preserves speed or bleeds it off.

Climbing rating: 5.3/10. Within Road bikes, this comes out around the middle. The low gear should feel friendly on most hills. The easiest gear works out to about 24.4 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~80% versus similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. Weight is around 14.7 kg, which you notice more on longer or slower climbs. It won’t be the absolute best climber, but it won’t hold you back on most climbs either. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

On the gravel side of things, with a 4.4/10 aero score, it prioritizes confidence and control over drag reduction so it’s happier when the route gets rough than when it gets windy. In everyday language, it’s more about stability and everyday comfort than cutting through the wind. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. In real riding, it usually feels steady and comfortable, with less advantage on open flats or into a headwind.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. You get this posture because there's about 56 mm of drop to the bars (moderate), with roughly 591 mm of forward stretch to the bar (very long). Estimated lean is about 30 degrees. Gravel geometry often balances comfort and control over rough surfaces.

Overall, it falls into Adjustable. Main reasons for the fit flexibility result: This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability, Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical, and The listed seatpost details do not show clear restrictions or extra flexibility signals. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Ride comfort is 6.7/10 — on a real ride it feels easygoing over rough patches. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. It’s running about 50 mm tires on 700c wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~30°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This looks like strong value without any tricky caveats. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 23% under the typical level for similar builds. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 86% of listings. To anchor it: price €1.499 versus an estimated €1.951 for a similar build. Put simply: this is strong value for what’s included.

This setup suits typical singletrack and varied natural terrain. Suspension travel is unknown in this entry, so the surface range uses the clearest available signals. Even though it’s tagged Gravel, the setup fits Natural Trails better.