SuperSix EVO Carbon Disc Ultegra

On asphalt, it's mainly a question of resistance and efficiency, and that's what the score summarizes. The strongest influences are narrow road tires that keep resistance low, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Add it all up and you get a clear tilt toward speed or toward utility.

Overall on climbs: 2.4/10. Within Road bikes, it lands below average. On longer climbs, the gearing lands on the tall side. Your easiest gear lands around 30.4 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~35% for low-gear climbing. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

In race-focused terms, that 7.6/10 aero rating suggests that with tidier routing up front, it’s in the fast-road aero territory especially once speeds rise. What that means on the road is: it’s built with speed in mind, with choices that reduce wind drag once you’re riding faster. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Rims around 35mm are more of an all-round choice than a pure aero choice. These wheels lean more toward stability and versatility than pure aero. That tyre width is common on performance road builds and tends to suit aero goals. Details like hidden cables and a cleaner cockpit can add up to small aero gains at speed. Different brands share different amounts of detail, so this uses the most consistent cues that are available. When you’re riding quickly, this kind of design can feel easier to keep rolling at the same speed.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. You get this posture because the front end is large, with ~106 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a long stretch forward at ~563 mm. You'll likely be near 40 degrees of lean. Spacer height is roughly 10 mm.

What affects adjustability on this bike: The front-end is built as a single system, which reduces easy fit part swaps, Internal routing looks tidy but can make cockpit changes a bit more fiddly. At the same time, Because the seatpost is non-standard, you typically have fewer replacement and setback options. So it ends up in Limited Adjustment. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Comfort comes out to 2.2/10, which usually translates to a harsh on rough surfaces ride. That’s the reason it lands as Race-Stiff. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and narrow tires usually mean higher pressure, so more buzz comes through on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~40°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

From a value angle, this comes out as a standout deal. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 22% under the typical level for similar builds. In its peer group, it tends to be better-priced than many, beating about 80% of listings. To anchor it: price €4.829 versus an estimated €6.153 for a similar build. Put simply: this is strong value for what’s included.

This bike is best when your rides stay on clean tarmac. The tire size is around 25 mm, which is typical for fast road setups. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.