San Remo

For road riding, the score leans toward outright pace rather than comfort-first priorities. Several build choices play a role, including a fairly average weight, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, narrow road tires that keep resistance low, and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value. All else equal, it aims for an all-round feel more than maximum speed.

If your rides include hills, it rates 5.8/10 for climbing. Within Road bikes, it ranks around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels moderate. That lowest gear comes out around 28.7 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~40% for low-gear climbing. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. At about 9.3 kg, it’s in a normal range, so gearing matters more than weight swings here. It won’t be the absolute best climber, but it won’t hold you back on most climbs either. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

As a race-focused bike, with more integrated details, coming in at 8.1/10 on aero, it’s in the fast-road aero territory particularly on flatter, wind-exposed sections. The short version is: it’s built with speed in mind, with choices that reduce wind drag once you’re riding faster. This tyre size generally plays nicely with aero goals compared with very wide all-road tyres. Details like hidden cables and a cleaner cockpit can add up to small aero gains at speed. In real riding, it tends to reward holding speed: the faster you go, the more the aero design helps.

Sporty fit - you'll lean forward more and feel ready to push the pace. You get this posture because bar height comes out ~101 mm below the saddle (large), with about 566 mm of forward reach - a long stretch. Expect a lean angle around 39 degrees.

In Road / Race, This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: Separate bar and stem components keep fit changes practical, A more service-friendly routing setup makes changes easier. Plus, Round, standard seatposts are generally easier to adjust and swap. Net result: Adjustable. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

This scores 2.2/10 for comfort, so it feels stiff-feeling out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Race-Stiff. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and narrow tires usually mean higher pressure, so more buzz comes through on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~39°), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

This looks like strong value without any tricky caveats. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 42% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 94% of listings. To anchor it: price €1.312 versus an estimated €2.252 for a similar build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This setup is focused on speed and efficiency on paved roads. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.