Roadmachine 01 AMP THREE

On asphalt, it's mainly a question of resistance and efficiency, and that's what the score summarizes. Next to race-leaning setups, this build is shaped by a heavier build, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Put simply, it's designed for a mix of riding rather than top-end pace.

Climb score: 5.1/10. Within e-road bikes, it lands around the middle. It has a middle-of-the-road low gear for climbing. Your easiest gear lands around 27.0 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~54% versus similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. At roughly 13.1 kg, the bike’s heft shows up most on sustained climbs. E-assist can take the sting out of steep ramps, especially at lower speeds. It won’t be the absolute best climber, but it won’t hold you back on most climbs either. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

Seen as an endurance option, with geometry that’s fairly neutral, scoring 6.4/10 on aero, it lands in the ‘do-most-things-well’ aero zone so it feels ‘quick enough’ without being a pure aero build. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. This is mainly because the cockpit sits 83 mm below the saddle (a large drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~555 mm (long). Estimated lean is about 36 degrees.

Why this fit flexibility rating: An integrated cockpit tends to limit simple changes like a different stem length, Hidden cables usually add a little friction when you swap bars or stems - This seatpost design is more specific than a round standard post, which reduces flexibility. So it ends up in Limited Adjustment.

This scores 5.0/10 for comfort, so it feels moderately comfortable out on the road. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. It’s running about 32 mm tires on 700c wheels, and there’s a bit of cushion, but it still rides fairly direct on rough pavement on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~36°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

This sits around the normal range for similar bikes. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 9% above the typical level for similar builds. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 53% of listings). Quick reference: €7.350 listed versus about €6.713 for a comparable build. Put simply: you’re paying roughly what similar bikes tend to cost.

This bike is road-focused, but it’s more forgiving on bumpy pavement. Tires around 32 mm add comfort and grip when the road surface breaks up. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.