Roadmachine 01 AMP THREE USA

It's neither sluggish nor razor-fast - more of a versatile middle ground. On paved roads, the rating is mostly about fast cruising and how the setup supports higher speeds. The score is largely shaped by a heavier build, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding.

On steep roads, it comes in at 5.1/10. Within e-road bikes, it ranks around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels moderate. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 27.0 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~54% of them. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. Weight is around 13.1 kg, which you notice more on longer or slower climbs. Being an e-bike helps on climbs because the assist adds steady push when you need it. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

For an endurance build, aero-wise, at 6.4/10, with geometry that’s fairly neutral, it’s a practical middle ground so it’s more efficient than it looks once you’re rolling. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The endurance tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. The wheels are on the shallower side (around 25mm), so frame shapes and position likely matter more than wheel depth here. That wheel depth is more all-round than purely aero-focused. Tyres around 32mm are a practical middle ground, with a small aero trade-off compared with narrower race tyres. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. You get this posture because the front end is large, with ~83 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a long stretch forward at ~555 mm. You'll likely be near 36 degrees of lean.

So it ends up in Limited Adjustment. What affects adjustability on this bike: A one-piece cockpit locks the front-end setup more than separate bar and stem parts, Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts. Plus, A proprietary post often means fewer off-the-shelf alternatives.

Comfort comes out to 5.0/10, which usually translates to a fairly neutral ride. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. It’s running about 32 mm tires on 700c wheels, and there’s a bit of cushion, but it still rides fairly direct on rough pavement on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~36°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

This doesn’t look like the best deal once you compare it to similar builds. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 19% above the typical level for similar builds. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 32% of listings). To anchor it: price €7.999 versus an estimated €6.713 for a similar build. Bottom line: you may be paying extra versus similar options.

This is a road bike that stays comfortable when the pavement gets rough. The tire size is around 32 mm, which helps smooth out rough pavement. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.