Confluence Flat Bar Altus

On the road, small changes in drag and tire resistance add up, and this score captures that effect. Pedal assist doesn't erase physics; tire drag and weight still influence pace, and this score reflects that. The strongest influences are a heavier build, a mass profile that isn't optimized for punchy acceleration, very wide tires that create extra drag, and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value.

If your rides include hills, it rates 4.6/10 for climbing. Within e-road bikes, it ranks around the middle. The easiest gear is on the tall side for proper hills. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 30.0 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~28% for low-gear climbing. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. With about 14.7 kg to haul uphill, pacing matters more on longer grades. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. It can climb, but you’ll likely prefer smoother pacing on longer hills. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

In gravel terms, that 4.6/10 aero rating suggests that it keeps decent wind efficiency without becoming a specialist so it won’t hold you back on normal fast riding. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. This setup supports a more race-leaning posture, helping you present less of your body to the wind. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. It feels this way because you get a moderate drop: roughly 51 mm from saddle to bar, plus about 593 mm of stretch forward (very long). Plan for roughly 30 degrees of lean. Gravel setups typically avoid an extreme tuck for stability.

What drives the fit flexibility here: Separate bar and stem components keep fit changes practical, and The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. So we classify it as Adjustable. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

This scores 6.2/10 for comfort, so it feels comfortable out on the road. That’s why it’s labeled Balanced. It’s running about 42 mm tires on 700c wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~30°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

Compared to similar bikes, this is priced very competitively. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 22% under the typical level for similar builds. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 91% of listings. To anchor it: price €2.499 versus an estimated €3.191 for a similar build. Put simply: this is strong value for what’s included.

This setup is built for mixed rides where gravel is a normal part of the route. Tires around 42 mm are well suited for gravel roads and unpaved connectors. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.