G3 Tandem 7.83 Tandem

For road bikes, this score reflects how easily the bike carries speed on smooth tarmac. For e-bikes, this still reflects the bike's rolling and aero traits more than raw motor output. A few practical factors stand out: a heavier build, very wide tires that create extra drag, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance.

How it climbs: 2.2/10. Within e-road bikes, it sits below average. It has a middle-of-the-road low gear for climbing. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 27.0 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~54% of them. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. Weight is around 41.0 kg — on steep, slow climbs that extra mass becomes more noticeable. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

Sitting at 3.9/10 for aero, aero isn’t the headline priority so you may work a bit more into headwinds. In everyday language, it’s more about stability and everyday comfort than cutting through the wind. The touring category also hints at the intent behind the design. The wheels are on the shallower side (around 30mm), so frame shapes and position likely matter more than wheel depth here. That wheel depth is more all-round than purely aero-focused. Different brands share different amounts of detail, so this uses the most consistent cues that are available. In real riding, it usually feels steady and comfortable, with less advantage on open flats or into a headwind.

Comfort fit - less tuck and easier on neck and shoulders. This is an estimate; exact fit varies by spacers and rider setup.

In E-bikeRoad, Overall, it falls into Adjustable. This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time; The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Ride comfort is 7.8/10 — on a real ride it feels very smooth. That’s the reason it lands as Comfortable. It’s running about 62 mm tires on 650b wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is upright (posture 4/10), which makes long rides feel easier on the body.

This looks like a high asking price for the build level. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 166% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 0% of them. To anchor it: price €11.287 versus an estimated €4.251 for a similar build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Put simply: it’s priced more like a premium pick than a value buy.

This bike is built for everyday trails with a mix of roots, rocks, and turns. Suspension travel details aren’t available here, so the label follows the category and the rest of the setup. Suspension type (Rigid) fits this kind of terrain.