Fourstroke 01 TWO

This off-road speed score leans toward efficient rolling, not downhill stability or comfort. Over longer efforts, it tends to feel slower when you try to hold a high tempo. Key drivers include typical trail-width tires, wheel momentum that helps it carry speed between pedal strokes, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding.

Overall on climbs: 5.9/10. Within Mountain bikes, it lands around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels easy. Your easiest gear lands around 19.3 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~18% for low-gear climbing. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. You’ll be able to keep a steady spin even when it gets steep. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

For bump control, it’s 5/10 — “Confident trail control”. It’s built for clear bump absorption and more reliable wheel control on mixed surfaces. With suspension in the front and rear, the bike can stay more settled through repeated bumps. Expect steadier tracking on rougher sections without feeling like a long-travel downhill setup.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. That's driven by the bar sits about 94 mm below the saddle (a large drop), and you'll be stretched forward about 636 mm in total (very long). Expect a lean angle around 36 degrees.

Net result: Moderately Adjustable. What affects adjustability on this bike: A modular front-end gives more freedom to change stem length or bar width, Because cables are routed internally, adjustments may take more work - A dropper post adds practical adjustability while riding.

Ride comfort is 7.3/10 — on a real ride it feels comfortable. So it’s tagged Comfortable overall. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 8/10, torso ~36°), which puts you in an attack stance, which can feel more intense on long, rough descents.

This looks like a high asking price for the build level. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 227% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 4% of them. To anchor it: price €10.290 versus an estimated €3.150 for a similar build. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This bike is best for smoother trails where speed and efficiency matter. It has about 100 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which suits smoother trails. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.