Venturi STC 105 Di2 Tailormade

For road riding, the score leans toward outright pace rather than comfort-first priorities. Several build choices play a role, including all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. In combination, they decide how the bike feels when rolling along.

Uphill performance score: 2.8/10. Within Road bikes, it lands below average. On climbs, the lowest gear feels moderate. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 28.6 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~47% for low-gear climbing. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. It won’t be the absolute best climber, but it won’t hold you back on most climbs either. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

As an aero bike, rated 9.0/10 for aero, with a cleaner-looking front end, drag reduction is a headline goal where aerodynamics is the main lever. Put simply, it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. A more integrated front end usually reduces minor drag points around the cockpit. The faster you ride, the more this aero focus tends to show up in how it holds speed.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. Aero intent typically nudges you into a sleeker position. Mostly geometry-based, with a small category-based estimate.

Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Hidden cables usually add a little friction when you swap bars or stems. Another point: Notable system naming mentioned: SMR. Overall, it is Moderately Adjustable.

This scores 2.5/10 for comfort, so it feels harsh on rough surfaces out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Race-Stiff. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

This looks like strong value without any tricky caveats. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 35% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 95% of listings. To anchor it: price €4.126 versus an estimated €6.302 for a similar build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This setup is focused on speed and efficiency on paved roads. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.