Endurance SL Disc – Sport

This road-focused speed score is primarily about smooth-surface momentum and top-end efficiency. On typical routes, it's neither sluggish nor razor-fast - more of a versatile middle ground. What pushes it in this direction is a default tire-width baseline, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding.

If your rides include hills, it rates 3.8/10 for climbing. Within Road bikes, it sits below average. It has a reasonably easy low gear for steady climbing. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 25.5 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~72% for low-gear climbing. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

Seen as an endurance option, given a more tucked posture, at 6.2/10 for aerodynamics, it’s an all-round aero level so it works well across lots of riding. What that means on the road is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Different categories trade aerodynamics against comfort and stability—endurance is part of that story. This setup supports a more race-leaning posture, helping you present less of your body to the wind. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Balanced fit - a versatile position for long rides and faster efforts. Because the bar sits about 103 mm below the saddle (a large drop), and you'll be stretched forward about 553 mm in total (long). Expect a lean angle around 40 degrees.

In Road / Endurance, What affects adjustability on this bike: Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time; The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. So we classify it as Adjustable.

This scores 5.0/10 for comfort, so it feels fairly neutral out on the road. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~40°), which tends to feel more direct, especially over rougher sections.

This looks like a high asking price for the build level. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 39% above what similar builds typically cost. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 37% of listings). Quick reference: €3.120 listed versus about €2.250 for a comparable build. Some manufacturer details aren’t fully published, so use this as a helpful direction rather than a final verdict. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This setup is made for real-world roads with cracks and patches. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.