Road Bike EDR CF 105 Disc

On asphalt, it's mainly a question of resistance and efficiency, and that's what the score summarizes. The strongest influences are a light setup, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, narrow road tires that keep resistance low, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance.

How it climbs: 5.4/10. Within Road bikes, it lands around the middle. This setup leans heavily toward ‘push’ rather than ‘spin’ on climbs. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 32.8 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~9% for low-gear climbing. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. Weight is around 8.2 kg, which is typical for this kind of build. On proper hills, you’ll feel it — this setup isn’t built to make climbing effortless. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

From an endurance perspective, aero-wise, at 6.2/10, it keeps decent wind efficiency without becoming a specialist so it works well across lots of riding. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. That tyre width is common on performance road builds and tends to suit aero goals. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Comfort fit - less tuck and easier on neck and shoulders. Endurance geometry usually trades some tuck for all-day comfort. Some measurements were missing, so part of this is estimated.

Why this fit flexibility rating: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, and Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability. Overall, it falls into Adjustable.

This scores 3.1/10 for comfort, so it feels quite direct out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Race-Stiff. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and narrow tires usually mean higher pressure, so more buzz comes through on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This feels like you’re paying extra for the same kind of bike. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 30% above what similar builds typically cost. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 43% of listings). Quick reference: €2.871 listed versus about €2.205 for a comparable build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Overall, it doesn’t look like the best value for the spec.

This bike is built for smooth pavement and fast road riding. The tire size is around 25 mm, which is typical for fast road setups. Even though it’s tagged Endurance, the spec pushes it toward Road Only.