Radar Expert

This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. The strongest influences are a heavier build, very wide tires that create extra drag, a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance. This means it's better suited to relaxed riding than pushing fast splits.

If your rides include hills, it rates 6.3/10 for climbing. Within Road bikes, it lands around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels very easy. Your easiest gear lands around 22.5 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~93% for low-gear climbing. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. With about 13.1 kg to haul uphill, pacing matters more on longer grades. It’s set up so climbs feel controlled rather than a grind. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

Category-wise (gravel), that 4.4/10 aero rating suggests that it leans toward real-world stability first so it’s happier when the route gets rough than when it gets windy. What that means on the road is: it’s more about stability and everyday comfort than cutting through the wind. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Wider tyres like this tend to trade a bit of aero efficiency for comfort and confidence. In real riding, it usually feels steady and comfortable, with less advantage on open flats or into a headwind.

Comfort fit - less tuck and easier on neck and shoulders. You get this posture because the bar sits about 42 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and you'll be stretched forward about 563 mm in total (long). You'll likely be near 28 degrees of lean. Gravel geometry often balances comfort and control over rough surfaces.

In Road / Gravel, So we classify it as Adjustable. This bike's adjustability comes down to cockpit, routing, and seat setup: This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability - Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Comfort comes out to 6.4/10, which usually translates to a nicely smooth ride. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. It’s running about 45 mm tires on 700c wheels, and wider tires let you drop pressure a touch, which smooths out rough pavement on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is upright (posture 4/10), which takes pressure off your hands and back, which usually feels more relaxed.

For what you get, the price looks very hard to beat. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 50% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 98% of listings. To anchor it: price €1.099 versus an estimated €2.182 for a similar build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This setup is built for mixed rides where gravel is a normal part of the route. Tires around 45 mm are well suited for gravel roads and unpaved connectors. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.