Gravel 725 – Sport

It's neither sluggish nor razor-fast - more of a versatile middle ground. On the road, small changes in drag and tire resistance add up, and this score captures that effect. What pushes it in this direction is a baseline tire-width assumption, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind...

On steep roads, it comes in at 4.1/10. Within Road bikes, it lands around the middle. On longer climbs, the gearing lands on the easy side. The easiest gear works out to about 24.5 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~78% versus similar bikes. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. A good middle-ground if you want mixed routes that include some hills. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

For a gravel build, scoring 4.7/10 on aero, it sits in the ‘good enough everywhere’ aero zone so it sits comfortably in the all-rounder lane. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts. In open wind, your typical riding position matters as much as the frame shapes. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. That's driven by you get a moderate drop: roughly 70 mm from saddle to bar, plus about 562 mm of stretch forward (long). You'll likely be near 34 degrees of lean.

So we classify it as Adjustable. This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability. Plus, Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Comfort comes out to 5.6/10, which usually translates to a fairly neutral ride. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~34°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

Against comparable bikes, this comes out looking overpriced. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 47% above what similar builds typically cost. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 28% of listings). To anchor it: price €2.371 versus an estimated €1.618 for a similar build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Put simply: it’s priced more like a premium pick than a value buy.

This setup leans toward stability and comfort when surfaces get unpredictable. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. It’s listed as Gravel, but the setup aligns better with Adventure.