HULK 4.0 Carbon Gravel Bike 20 Speed

When the riding is smooth, speed comes down to resistance and weight, and that's what this rating emphasizes. In contrast to speed-optimized builds, this build is shaped by wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag, aerodynamics that help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value. That's why it tends to feel slower when you try to hold a high tempo.

Uphill performance score: 4.4/10. Within Road bikes, it lands around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels very easy. That lowest gear comes out around 23.8 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~86% for low-gear climbing. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. You’ll be able to keep a steady spin even when it gets steep. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

That 4.4/10 aero rating suggests that running tyres around 40mm, it leans toward real-world stability first with less emphasis on airflow tricks. Put simply, it’s more about stability and everyday comfort than cutting through the wind. The gravel tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. The wheels are on the shallower side (around 30mm), so frame shapes and position likely matter more than wheel depth here. That wheel depth is more all-round than purely aero-focused. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. Different brands share different amounts of detail, so this uses the most consistent cues that are available. In real riding, it usually feels steady and comfortable, with less advantage on open flats or into a headwind.

Comfort fit - a relaxed road posture that stays friendly on longer rides. Based on full geometry data.

In Road / Gravel, Overall, it falls into Adjustable. The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts, Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability; The listed seatpost details do not show clear restrictions or extra flexibility signals. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Ride comfort is 6.0/10 — on a real ride it feels balanced. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. It’s running about 40 mm tires on 700c wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

Compared to similar bikes, this is priced very competitively. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 18% under the typical level for similar builds. In its peer group, it tends to be better-priced than many, beating about 82% of listings. Quick reference: €2.299 listed versus about €2.792 for a comparable build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This bike is ready for gravel roads while staying efficient on paved stretches. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.