FALCON 7.0 Di2 Full Carbon Road Bike 24S

On the road, small changes in drag and tire resistance add up, and this score captures that effect. Compared with bikes built for pure pace, this build is shaped by a light setup, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, narrow road tires that keep resistance low, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Under the hood, the mass profile helps when you accelerate or climb at tempo.

Climb score: 3.0/10. Within Road bikes, it sits below average. This setup leans heavily toward ‘push’ rather than ‘spin’ on climbs. That lowest gear comes out around 76.5 gear inches. Most comparable bikes have an easier low gear; this is easier than only about ~1% of them. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. With about 7.8 kg under you, it has a nice advantage when gravity is the main enemy. This is happiest on flatter terrain; steep stuff will feel demanding. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

As a race-focused bike, that 7.4/10 aero rating suggests that on low-profile (~25mm) wheels, it aims for usable speed without big trade-offs so it sits comfortably in the all-rounder lane. What that means on the road is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Different categories trade aerodynamics against comfort and stability—race is part of that story. The wheels are on the shallower side (around 25mm), so frame shapes and position likely matter more than wheel depth here. That wheel depth is more all-round than purely aero-focused. This tyre size generally plays nicely with aero goals compared with very wide all-road tyres. Details like hidden cables and a cleaner cockpit can add up to small aero gains at speed. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Sporty fit - you'll lean forward more and feel ready to push the pace. Some measurements were missing, so part of this is estimated.

Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. Also, Seatpost info looks fairly neutral, so most fit change comes from cockpit choices. That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Comfort comes out to 2.1/10, which usually translates to a harsh on rough surfaces ride. That’s the reason it lands as Race-Stiff. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and you feel more of the road texture with narrow tires on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

This looks like a great buy for the spec on paper. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 32% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 90% of listings. Quick reference: €3.999 listed versus about €5.922 for a comparable build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This bike is best when your rides stay on clean tarmac. The tire size is around 25 mm, which is typical for fast road setups. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.