ORDU OMX FRAME

For road riding, the score leans toward outright pace rather than comfort-first priorities. The main reasons are a default tire-width baseline, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance. As a result, it's not at the sharpest end of outright speed.

How it climbs: 1.8/10. Within Road bikes, it sits near the bottom. You may find yourself pushing a bit more on steeper grades. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 32.4 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~18% for low-gear climbing. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. This is happiest on flatter terrain; steep stuff will feel demanding. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

Looking at it as a triathlon setup, aero-wise, at 9.4/10, it’s built to minimize air resistance at pace where aerodynamics is the main lever. The short version is: it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. A more integrated front end usually reduces minor drag points around the cockpit. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. The faster you ride, the more this aero focus tends to show up in how it holds speed.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. TT/tri intent often means a more extreme tuck with the right setup. Based on full geometry data.

This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward. Plus, Internal routing looks tidy but can make cockpit changes a bit more fiddly. Net result: Moderately Adjustable.

Ride comfort is 2.8/10 — on a real ride it feels quite direct. That’s the reason it lands as Firm. The posture is race-leaning (posture 8/10), which tends to feel more direct, especially over rougher sections.

This looks like a typical market price for the spec. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec estimate, the price is close to what we’d expect for a comparable build. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 59% of listings). To anchor it: price €3.989 versus an estimated €3.793 for a similar build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Bottom line: it’s a normal deal — not amazing, not terrible.

This setup is focused on speed and efficiency on paved roads. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.