Current

In a road context, the speed rating is about holding pace with less effort once you're up to speed. In comparison with more aero-focused bikes, this build is shaped by wider mixed-surface tires that add some drag, aerodynamics that help it hold speed once you're rolling, a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance.

Climbing rating: 4.8/10. Within e-road bikes, it sits around the middle. The easiest gear is very spin-friendly on hills. That lowest gear comes out around 21.9 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~88% versus similar bikes. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. It’s set up so climbs feel controlled rather than a grind. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

As an endurance bike, sitting at 5.7/10 for aero, it’s aero-aware without going extreme so it’s more efficient than it looks once you’re rolling. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The wheels are on the shallower side (around 25mm), so frame shapes and position likely matter more than wheel depth here. These wheels lean more toward stability and versatility than pure aero. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. A tidier cockpit and cable routing can help a little once you’re riding quickly. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Comfort fit - a relaxed road posture that stays friendly on longer rides. It feels this way because handlebar height is roughly 23 mm lower than the saddle (very small drop), and how far you'll be stretched forward is about 578 mm (long). Expect a lean angle around 25 degrees. Endurance geometry usually trades some tuck for all-day comfort.

Overall, it falls into Adjustable. Here is the simple reasoning behind the fit flexibility rating: The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts. Another point: Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

This scores 6.2/10 for comfort, so it feels nicely smooth out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. It’s running about 40 mm tires on 700c wheels, and wider tires let you drop pressure a touch, which smooths out rough pavement on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is upright (posture 4/10), which makes long rides feel easier on the body.

This looks like strong value without any tricky caveats. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 30% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 93% of listings. To anchor it: price €4.100 versus an estimated €5.847 for a similar build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This bike is made for mixed routes: pavement plus smooth dirt or hardpack. Tires around 40 mm are a good middle ground for varied surfaces. The wheel setup (700c) supports that direction.