CGR AL e – Sport

For road riding, the score leans toward outright pace rather than comfort-first priorities. On an e-bike, the motor helps, but the bike's rolling setup still matters - this rating captures that side of speed. The biggest contributors are a baseline tire-width assumption, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value, and a more tucked...

How it climbs: 3.3/10. Within e-road bikes, this comes out below average. For hill work, the easiest gear is moderate. The easiest gear works out to about 27.0 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~54% for low-gear climbing. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. A good middle-ground if you want mixed routes that include some hills. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

Category-wise (gravel), coming in at 4.5/10 on aero, it sits in the ‘good enough everywhere’ aero zone so it feels ‘quick enough’ without being a pure aero build. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts.

Comfort fit - less tuck and easier on neck and shoulders. That's driven by bar height comes out ~70 mm below the saddle (moderate), with about 549 mm of forward reach - a long stretch. Plan for roughly 34 degrees of lean. Gravel geometry often balances comfort and control over rough surfaces.

That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. Why this fit flexibility rating: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward; Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical.

Comfort comes out to 5.9/10, which usually translates to a moderately comfortable ride. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~34°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This looks like a typical market price for the spec. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec estimate, the price is close to what we’d expect for a comparable build. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 59% of listings). Quick reference: €3.494 listed versus about €3.305 for a comparable build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Put simply: you’re paying roughly what similar bikes tend to cost.

This setup is built for mixed rides where gravel is a normal part of the route. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.