Gravel AL e – Sport

It lands in the middle: capable pace, but not optimized for outright speed. This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. Key drivers include a default tire-width baseline, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind...

If your rides include hills, it rates 4.1/10 for climbing. Within e-road bikes, this comes out around the middle. It has a reasonably easy low gear for steady climbing. Your easiest gear lands around 24.5 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~74% for low-gear climbing. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. Being an e-bike helps on climbs because the assist adds steady push when you need it. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

From a gravel perspective, with a 4.5/10 aero score, it’s tuned for mixed riding rather than pure aero focus so it’s more efficient than it looks once you’re rolling. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. Because the cockpit sits 70 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~562 mm (long). Estimated lean is about 34 degrees.

That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: A modular front-end gives more freedom to change stem length or bar width, Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts - Seatpost info looks fairly neutral, so most fit change comes from cockpit choices.

Ride comfort is 5.6/10 — on a real ride it feels moderately comfortable. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~34°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This looks like strong value, even if it’s not the absolute cheapest listing. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec estimate, the price is close to what we’d expect for a comparable build. In its peer group, it tends to be better-priced than many, beating about 66% of listings. To anchor it: price €3.245 versus an estimated €3.294 for a similar build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Bottom line: it compares well against similar bikes.

This bike is built for longer mixed-terrain days and rougher unpaved riding. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. It’s listed as Gravel, but the setup aligns better with Adventure.