Allroad SL R e – Pro

It's set up to reward hard efforts with higher cruising speed. For road bikes, this score reflects how easily the bike carries speed on smooth tarmac. The strongest influences are a baseline tire-width assumption, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Over a longer ride, it tends to feel more lively when you increase the pace.

On steep roads, it comes in at 3.3/10. Within e-road bikes, it lands below average. It has a middle-of-the-road low gear for climbing. The easiest gear works out to about 27.0 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~54% for low-gear climbing. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. E-assist can take the sting out of steep ramps, especially at lower speeds. A good middle-ground if you want mixed routes that include some hills. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

In general road terms, sitting at 5.5/10 for aero, with a fairly neutral fit, it’s built to be well-rounded in the wind so you get some benefit when the wind matters. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere. Small setup choices (wheels, tyres, cockpit) can shift how aero it feels on the road. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. You get this posture because the cockpit sits 94 mm below the saddle (a large drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~551 mm (long). You'll likely be near 38 degrees of lean.

Separate bar and stem components keep fit changes practical, and Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts. So we classify it as Adjustable. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Ride comfort is 5.0/10 — on a real ride it feels balanced. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~38°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

The price looks hard to justify versus similar options. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 46% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 5% of them. Quick reference: €7.489 listed versus about €5.128 for a comparable build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Put simply: it’s priced more like a premium pick than a value buy.

This is a road bike that stays comfortable when the pavement gets rough. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.