Gravel AL e – Pro

On paved roads, the rating is mostly about fast cruising and how the setup supports higher speeds. Compared with comfort-biased setups, this build is shaped by a baseline tire-width assumption, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance.

How it climbs: 4.1/10. Within e-road bikes, it sits around the middle. The low gear should feel friendly on most hills. Your easiest gear lands around 24.5 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~74% of them. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. It won’t be the absolute best climber, but it won’t hold you back on most climbs either. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

Seen as a gravel option, at 4.5/10 for aerodynamics, it keeps decent wind efficiency without becoming a specialist and it doesn’t force a specialist aero posture. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Different categories trade aerodynamics against comfort and stability—gravel is part of that story. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Different brands share different amounts of detail, so this uses the most consistent cues that are available. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. That's driven by bars are around 70 mm lower than the saddle, which is a moderate drop, and the forward stretch measures around 562 mm (long). You'll likely be near 34 degrees of lean.

Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time; The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket.

This scores 5.6/10 for comfort, so it feels fairly neutral out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~34°), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

This sits around the normal range for similar bikes. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec estimate, the price is close to what we’d expect for a comparable build. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 57% of listings). To anchor it: price €4.743 versus an estimated €4.439 for a similar build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Overall, it sits in the expected range for the category.

This setup leans toward stability and comfort when surfaces get unpredictable. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. It’s listed as Gravel, but the setup aligns better with Adventure.