SKITCH Apex Flat Bar / Carbon CC

When the riding is smooth, speed comes down to resistance and weight, and that's what this rating emphasizes. For e-bikes, this still reflects the bike's rolling and aero traits more than raw motor output. A few practical factors stand out: a heavier build, a mass profile that isn't optimized for punchy acceleration, very wide tires that create extra drag, and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on...

Climb score: 9.7/10. Within e-road bikes, it sits near the top. On climbs, the lowest gear feels very easy. That lowest gear comes out around 16.2 gear inches. It’s about as easy as it gets in its peer group — easier than roughly ~99% of similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. Weight is around 13.5 kg, which you notice more on longer or slower climbs. E-assist can take the sting out of steep ramps, especially at lower speeds. This kind of low gear helps you stay smooth on long or steep climbs. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

Looking at it as a gravel setup, scoring 4.3/10 on aero, it prioritizes confidence and control over drag reduction so outright speed on exposed flats isn’t the goal. What that means on the road is: it’s more about stability and everyday comfort than cutting through the wind. That tyre width leans toward grip and stability first, with a small aero penalty at speed. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. In real riding, it usually feels steady and comfortable, with less advantage on open flats or into a headwind.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. Because the cockpit sits 91 mm below the saddle (a large drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~574 mm (long). Plan for roughly 37 degrees of lean.

Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: Separate bar and stem components keep fit changes practical. Another point: Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability. Net result: Adjustable. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

This scores 6.4/10 for comfort, so it feels easygoing over rough patches out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. It’s running about 45 mm tires on 700c wheels, and extra tire volume helps mute vibration and small bumps on rough lanes and gravel patches. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~37°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This doesn’t look like the best deal once you compare it to similar builds. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 24% above the typical level for similar builds. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 26% of listings). To anchor it: price €5.999 versus an estimated €4.833 for a similar build. Overall, it doesn’t look like the best value for the spec.

This bike is comfortable on gravel roads and unpaved back roads, and it still rides well on tarmac. Tires around 45 mm are well suited for gravel roads and unpaved connectors. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.