eXR 6090 B Touring II

When the riding is smooth, speed comes down to resistance and weight, and that's what this rating emphasizes. As a result, it trades speed for comfort, durability, or practicality. A few practical factors stand out: very wide tires that create extra drag, a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value, and a more tucked riding position that cuts wind resistance.

If your rides include hills, it rates 7.4/10 for climbing. Within e-road bikes, it ranks above average. It’s set up for smooth spinning on steeper climbs. Your easiest gear lands around 18.0 gear inches. For the low gear, it’s right at the easy end — easier than about ~98% of similar bikes. We use “gear inches” as a shortcut for climbing gearing. Lower numbers mean you can spin more easily when it gets steep. E-assist can take the sting out of steep ramps, especially at lower speeds. It’s set up so climbs feel controlled rather than a grind. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

On the touring side of things, scoring 4.5/10 on aero, it sits in the ‘good enough everywhere’ aero zone so it’s more efficient than it looks once you’re rolling. The short version is: it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Its touring label helps explain the balance between speed, comfort, and versatility. A lower, longer stance usually helps you ride more efficiently in the wind once speed picks up. A more integrated front end usually reduces minor drag points around the cockpit. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts.

Sporty fit - a performance-leaning position that encourages speed. That's driven by the front end is moderate, with ~52 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a extreme stretch forward at ~648 mm. Expect a lean angle around 29 degrees. Front-end spacers are estimated around 20 mm.

Net result: Moderately Adjustable. This bike's adjustability comes down to cockpit, routing, and seat setup: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Routing through the headset can make cockpit swaps harder than normal internal routing. Another point: From the seatpost text provided, there are no strong constraints or bonuses. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Ride comfort is 5.6/10 — on a real ride it feels fairly neutral. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10), which tends to feel more direct, especially over rougher sections.

This looks like a typical market price for the spec. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec estimate, the price is close to what we’d expect for a comparable build. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 53% of listings). Quick reference: €5.092 listed versus about €4.747 for a comparable build. Put simply: you’re paying roughly what similar bikes tend to cost.

This bike is built for everyday trails with a mix of roots, rocks, and turns. Suspension travel is unknown in this entry, so the surface range uses the clearest available signals. Suspension type (Hardtail) fits this kind of terrain.