Electrical Assistance Road Bike E-EDR AF 105 2x11S

This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. Compared with comfort-biased setups, this build is shaped by a heavier build, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance.

How it climbs: 4.9/10. Within e-road bikes, it ranks around the middle. The low gear is workable, but not super easy on steep ramps. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 27.0 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~54% for low-gear climbing. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. At roughly 14.0 kg, the bike’s heft shows up most on sustained climbs. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

On the general road side of things, coming in at 5.8/10 on aero, it sits in the ‘good enough everywhere’ aero zone so it feels ‘quick enough’ without being a pure aero build. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. That tyre width is common on performance road builds and tends to suit aero goals. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. This is an estimate; exact fit varies by spacers and rider setup.

Here is the simple reasoning behind the fit flexibility rating: This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability. At the same time, Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical. Overall, it falls into Adjustable.

Ride comfort is 3.9/10 — on a real ride it feels quite direct. So it’s tagged Firm overall. It’s running about 26 mm tires on 700c wheels, and you feel more of the road texture with narrow tires on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10), which keeps things neutral and easy to live with.

Compared to similar bikes, this is priced very competitively. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 34% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 86% of listings. Quick reference: €2.496 listed versus about €3.810 for a comparable build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Overall, it looks like a great-value pick in its category.

This bike is road-focused, but it’s more forgiving on bumpy pavement. Tires around 32 mm add comfort and grip when the road surface breaks up. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.