P.3 Rahmen

This off-road speed score leans toward efficient rolling, not downhill stability or comfort. What pushes it in this direction is typical trail-width tires and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance. On hardpack, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground (with a bit of defaulting).

If your rides include hills, it rates 8.6/10 for climbing. Within Mountain bikes, it sits near the top. It’s set up for smooth spinning on steeper climbs. Your easiest gear lands around 16.9 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~77% versus similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

Suspension capability comes out at 1/10. Bucket: “Minimal suspension”. In practice, it’s at its best on steady, predictable surfaces. No suspension travel here — the frame/fork stay fixed over bumps. On rougher ground the wheels can skip more because there’s no suspension movement to keep them tracking the surface.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. You get this posture because the cockpit sits 99 mm below the saddle (a large drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~584 mm (very long). Expect a lean angle around 38 degrees.

In Mountain / Dirt Jump, Net result: Moderately Adjustable. Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts, Hidden cables usually add a little friction when you swap bars or stems. Plus, The dropper post improves on-the-fly position changes. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Comfort comes out to 6.2/10, which usually translates to a nicely smooth ride. So it’s tagged Comfortable overall. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 7/10, torso ~38°), which loads the front wheel, which feels great for control but a bit more direct through the bars.

This looks like a great buy for the spec on paper. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the parts list, it’s roughly 45% cheaper than what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it tends to be better-priced than many, beating about 69% of listings. Quick reference: €953 listed versus about €1.718 for a comparable build. Some manufacturer details aren’t fully published, so use this as a helpful direction rather than a final verdict. Overall, it looks like a great-value pick in its category.

This setup is built to handle steep lines and heavy impacts. Suspension travel details aren’t available here, so the label follows the category and the rest of the setup. Suspension type (Rigid) fits this kind of terrain.