Ultra Tri Disc – Enthusiast

On paved roads, the rating is mostly about fast cruising and how the setup supports higher speeds. As a result, it's quick enough for most rides, but not a pure fastest-possible build. It trends this way because of a default tire-width baseline, a high-end drivetrain that tends to feel crisp under load, and a relaxed posture that gives up some aero efficiency.

Climb score: 2.8/10. Within Road bikes, this comes out below average. On climbs, the lowest gear feels moderate. Your easiest gear lands around 28.6 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~47% for low-gear climbing. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

As a triathlon bike, given a more tucked posture, aero-wise, at 9.5/10, aero is one of the main points of the design and it’s built to feel efficient at pace. What that means on the road is: it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. The triathlon tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. This setup supports a more race-leaning posture, helping you present less of your body to the wind. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. The faster you ride, the more this aero focus tends to show up in how it holds speed.

Race / Pro fit - a low, stretched position built for speed and aerodynamics. It feels this way because handlebar height is roughly 154 mm lower than the saddle (very large drop), and how far you'll be stretched forward is about 604 mm (very long). Expect a lean angle around 47 degrees.

Net result: Moderately Adjustable. Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, A more service-friendly routing setup makes changes easier, and Seatpost details do not strongly point to a very locked-in or very flexible system. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

This scores 2.7/10 for comfort, so it feels firm out on the road. So it’s tagged Firm overall. The posture is race-leaning (posture 9/10, torso ~47°), which tends to feel more direct, especially over rougher sections.

Against comparable bikes, this comes out looking overpriced. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 45% above what similar builds typically cost. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 27% of listings). To anchor it: price €6.865 versus an estimated €4.741 for a similar build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Overall, you can likely find better value elsewhere.

This bike is built for smooth pavement and fast road riding. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.