160E T2

In MTB terms, the score is mostly about momentum on flats and climbs, rather than jump or drop capability. Pedal assist doesn't erase physics; tire drag and weight still influence pace, and this score reflects that. It ends up here thanks to typical trail-width tires and a high-end drivetrain that tends to feel crisp under load. On hardpack, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground.

Uphill performance score: 7.8/10. Within e-mountain bikes, it lands above average. On climbs, the lowest gear feels very easy. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 17.7 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~75% versus similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. E-assist can take the sting out of steep ramps, especially at lower speeds. This kind of low gear helps you stay smooth on long or steep climbs. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

Suspension effectiveness is 8/10. That aligns with “High-impact ready”. This level is aimed at repeated impacts and rougher terrain, keeping the bike more settled at speed. Suspension at both ends helps keep wheel tracking steadier when the surface gets rough. On roots and rocks, it should keep the bike calmer through repeated impacts. It’s designed to stay composed when impacts come quickly one after another, especially at higher speeds.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. That's driven by the bar sits about 48 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and you'll be stretched forward about 639 mm in total (very long). Expect a lean angle around 28 degrees. Estimated spacers: ~14 mm.

So it lands in Moderately Adjustable. What affects adjustability on this bike: The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts, Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical. Also, Seatpost info looks fairly neutral, so most fit change comes from cockpit choices. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Ride comfort is 6.9/10 — on a real ride it feels comfortable. That’s why it’s labeled Race-Stiff. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 7/10), which puts you in an attack stance, which can feel more intense on long, rough descents.

You’re paying a big premium here versus similar builds. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 41% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 20% of them. Quick reference: €10.800 listed versus about €7.682 for a comparable build. Overall, you can likely find better value elsewhere.

This bike is built for rougher, more technical trails where control matters. It has about 160 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which helps on rough, technical trails. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.