795 BLADE RS Proteam Black Ultra Mat Glossy

This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. Against more utility-focused bikes, this build is shaped by narrow road tires that keep resistance low, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, and a high-end drivetrain that tends to feel crisp under load. In day-to-day use, it's built to carry momentum with less wasted effort.

Climbing rating: 2.8/10. Within Road bikes, it lands below average. It has a middle-of-the-road low gear for climbing. That lowest gear comes out around 28.6 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~47% versus similar bikes. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

Scoring 9.9/10 on aero, it’s built with a ‘race the wind’ mindset so the faster you ride, the more it shows. Put simply, it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Rims around 47mm are more of an all-round choice than a pure aero choice. This looks like a practical wheel choice rather than a max-aero choice. That tyre width is common on performance road builds and tends to suit aero goals. Details like hidden cables and a cleaner cockpit can add up to small aero gains at speed. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. On fast flats and windy days, it’s built to feel like it wastes less energy pushing air.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. You get this posture because the front end is very large, with ~121 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a long stretch forward at ~561 mm. Estimated lean is about 43 degrees.

Here is the simple reasoning behind the fit flexibility rating: Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time, Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts. At the same time, From the seatpost text provided, there are no strong constraints or bonuses. So we classify it as Adjustable.

This scores 2.1/10 for comfort, so it feels very firm out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Race-Stiff. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and you feel more of the road texture with narrow tires on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~43°), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

This looks like a high asking price for the build level. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 102% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 0% of them. To anchor it: price €12.800 versus an estimated €6.339 for a similar build. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This setup is focused on speed and efficiency on paved roads. Tires around 25 mm usually mean it’s tuned for smooth-road speed. The wheel setup (700c) supports that direction.