795 BLADE RS Proteam White Full Glossy

For road riding, the score leans toward outright pace rather than comfort-first priorities. Most of the story comes from narrow road tires that keep resistance low, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. All else equal, it's set up to reward hard efforts with higher cruising speed.

Climbing rating: 2.8/10. Within Road bikes, it lands below average. It has a middle-of-the-road low gear for climbing. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 28.6 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~47% versus similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. It won’t be the absolute best climber, but it won’t hold you back on most climbs either. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

Seen as an aerorace option, an aero score of 9.6/10 means that it’s at the sharp end of aero priorities and it’s built to feel efficient at pace. Put simply, it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. A more integrated front end usually reduces minor drag points around the cockpit. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs. On fast flats and windy days, it’s built to feel like it wastes less energy pushing air.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. You get this posture because the front end is very large, with ~121 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a long stretch forward at ~556 mm. Expect a lean angle around 43 degrees.

Overall, it falls into Adjustable. The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts, Routing is relatively straightforward, which helps when you change cockpit parts. Another point: The listed seatpost details do not show clear restrictions or extra flexibility signals.

This scores 2.1/10 for comfort, so it feels harsh on rough surfaces out on the road. That’s why it’s labeled Race-Stiff. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and narrow tires usually mean higher pressure, so more buzz comes through on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~43°), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

This feels like you’re paying extra for the same kind of bike. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 22% above the typical level for similar builds. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 52% of listings). To anchor it: price €7.800 versus an estimated €6.383 for a similar build. Put simply: it’s a bit pricey for what you get.

This setup is focused on speed and efficiency on paved roads. The tire size is around 25 mm, which is typical for fast road setups. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.