JAM² 6.7

This off-road speed score leans toward efficient rolling, not downhill stability or comfort. This means it's better suited to relaxed riding than pushing fast splits. It ends up here thanks to a heavier build, wheel momentum that helps it carry speed between pedal strokes, typical trail-width tires, and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value.

If your rides include hills, it rates 1.1/10 for climbing. Within e-mountain bikes, it lands near the bottom. This setup leans heavily toward ‘push’ rather than ‘spin’ on climbs. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 72.0 gear inches. Most comparable bikes have an easier low gear; this is easier than only about ~1% of them. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. With roughly 24.9 kg under you, you’ll feel the weight on longer climbs even with a decent low gear. Being an e-bike helps on climbs because the assist adds steady push when you need it. This is happiest on flatter terrain; steep stuff will feel demanding. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

Suspension handling is rated 7/10. It matches “High-impact ready”. This level is aimed at repeated impacts and rougher terrain, keeping the bike more settled at speed. Both ends absorb impacts, improving how consistently the tires can follow rough terrain. Rough trails should feel more controlled, especially when hits stack up. Not every manufacturer lists complete suspension numbers, so the explanation relies on the suspension layout and what’s normal for this category.

Sporty fit - a performance-leaning position that encourages speed. It feels this way because bar height comes out ~88 mm below the saddle (large), with about 672 mm of forward reach - a extreme stretch. You'll likely be near 34 degrees of lean.

In E-bikeMountain / Crosscountry, Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability, Internal routing looks tidy but can make cockpit changes a bit more fiddly, A round post makes fit changes simpler than proprietary shapes. At the same time, A dropper makes it easier to shift between climbing and descending positions. Overall, it falls into Adjustable.

Comfort comes out to 6.9/10, which usually translates to a easygoing over rough patches ride. That’s why it’s labeled Comfortable. It’s running about 63 mm tires on 700c wheels, and the high-volume tires add a lot of damping and grip on roots, rocks, braking bumps, and repeated hits. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 8/10, torso ~34°), which puts you in an attack stance, which can feel more intense on long, rough descents.

This doesn’t look like the best deal once you compare it to similar builds. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 23% above the typical level for similar builds. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 24% of them. Quick reference: €5.774 listed versus about €4.690 for a comparable build. Put simply: it’s a bit pricey for what you get.

This setup suits steeper, rockier terrain and harder hits. It has about 150 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which helps on rough, technical trails. It’s listed as Crosscountry, but the parts point more toward Tech Trails.